The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Preserving Scholarly E-Journals
For research libraries, the long-term preservation of digital collections may well be the most important issue in digital libraries. In certain ways, digital materials are incredibly fragile, dependent for their continued utility upon technologies that undergo rapid and continual change. In the world of physical research materials, a great number of valuable research resources have been saved p...
متن کاملUpgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
Publishing a scholarly article is the final and perhaps most responsible stage of research that takes time and requires enormous effort of all stakeholders of science communication. Reviewers and editors when they evaluate journal submissions and select items for publishing often ground their decisions on the novelty and originality of the topics, validity and power of statistical and other tes...
متن کاملInstitutional Repositories: Home for Small Scholarly Journals?
Hannah Golan Burnett has recently joined the Library as a volunteer. Hannah will be initially working in the Chifley Library alongside Luciana who along with other Chifley staff members has been working on a project to deselect the Beta and U-matic videos that have been in storage on Level 1. Hannah has previously undertaken volunteer work in school libraries and her available hours for volunte...
متن کاملReviewers Index
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the sam...
متن کاملScholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Informetrics
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1751-1577
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.007